How is one difference of opinion sufficient to qualify the truth of a rift in the Anna Hazare camp between Hegde and Hazare himself in the eyes of the media? It only seems as if the media is hounding after something to stoke up the anti-graft debate in the minds of its audience again. Also, I don't like the newsreader on CNN IBN who comes on at about 10 in the morning (can't recall his name): he speaks with a vocal intonation that is heavily implicative and almost immediately rules out the possibility that he's trying any bit to be objective about the news.