- There is a man sitting under a table
- The following objects are placed on the table: a small vat of a concentrated acid and a guillotine-like blade
- A curtain is drown over the table to separate the objects to a half of the table
- If the vat of acid spills, it will burn a hole through the wood and kill the man underneath
- If the blade is dropped, it will slice through the wood and kill the man underneath
- On either side of the curtain, two men, A and B, are made to sit
- Both of them are independently made aware of the man under the table
- A is given responsibility over the vat of acid and B is given responsibility over the blade
- A is informed about the consequences of spilling the acid
- B is informed about the consequences of dropping the blade
- At some point, A accidentally tips the vat of acid but saves it from spilling over the table just in time
- However, the table has been upset enough to bring the blade down upon it, killing the man
- Is A's acquittal in a trial court dependent on or independent of his knowledge of the blade's existence?
Sunday, 3 July 2011
Judgment of actions: A thought experiment
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment