ITER & India

ITER stands for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. The project will aim to demonstrate the technological feasibility of nuclear fusion reactions and its deployment in the power generation sector.

India applied for membership in early 2005, and later that year, in October, its membership was approved by an inspection committee that visited the Institute of Plasma Research (IPR) in Ahmedabad. The group evaluated India’s ability to contribute meaningfully to the software and hardware requirements of ITER.

India’s foray into nuclear physics is not new; ever since the Pokhran test in 1998, the country has been constantly on the forefront of research in the nuclear sciences. Two important reasons drive R&D in the country in this direction.

The first is that the world’s largest reserves of thorium are located in India, with an estimated 650,000 tonnes remaining. Thorium is an important nuclear fuel and yields much more energy during the nuclear fission process than does uranium.

The second reason is, indirectly, the Indian education system, which encourages more science than technology amongst students. Consequently, the nation is a powerhouse for verifying, processing and interpreting second-hand information as can be obtained from CERN in Europe and Fermilab in the USA.

The ITER is scheduled to go online in 2012, and as we approach that date, its significance is gaining in the country because of the opposition the government has met with in setting up more fission reactors around the country. The arguments of the public are justified, but that doesn’t mean we are in a position to abandon the nuclear program.

Like all other sources of energy, there are problems, and the way to deal with these problems is not to brush them aside especially when the solutions can go a long way in resolving the energy crisis that threatens to cripple the nation. If we don’t switch to alternative sources of energy soon enough, fossil fuels will contribute as much as 60% to our energy source, and that is obviously unaffordable.

If the ITER becomes successful – and the chances are great that it will – then India’s full partnership with the program will translate into reduced costs when it comes to setting up nuclear fusion reactors. We need to give it some time, say, until 2016, for the technology to become fully deployable as a safe solution.

The ITER is not the only super-project that India is currently involved in. In Theni, about 500 km from here, a massive cavern is being excavated in the Bodi Hills to situate India’s first particle physics observatory. Called the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO), it will house the world’s largest neutrino detector that will study neutrinos coming from outer space as well as receive particles from the LHC at CERN for further study. The investment in the project is somewhere around Rs. 1,250 crore, and is expected to start functioning in 2012.

The national investment in R&D in India is currently 1.9% of the GDP. This translates to the faith the Indian government has begun to express in the scientific community. Right now, it does look like we are at a crossroads, where we must decide immediately to switch from nuclear fission reactors to solar power generators, but that’s not the end of the road.

Yes, renewable energy can be harnessed, but our research on that front is minimal, if not negligible. We can set up local grids that produce power and then feed it into the national grid at a feed-in tariff provided by the government, and that way, we can gradually reduce the load on the central grid.

At some point of time, we even might be able to define future growth rates based on just solar or wind power. However, nuclear fusion technology and the capabilities it purchases for growth and prosperity cannot be beat any time soon, and India’s emergence as a particle physics superpower is tied in to that goal.

ITER & India

ITER stands for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor. The project will aim to demonstrate the technological feasibility of nuclear fusion reactions and its deployment in the power generation sector.

India applied for membership in early 2005, and later that year, in October, its membership was approved by an inspection committee that visited the Institute of Plasma Research (IPR) in Ahmedabad. The group evaluated India’s ability to contribute meaningfully to the software and hardware requirements of ITER.

India’s foray into nuclear physics is not new; ever since the Pokhran test in 1998, the country has been constantly on the forefront of research in the nuclear sciences. Two important reasons drive R&D in the country in this direction.

The first is that the world’s largest reserves of thorium are located in India, with an estimated 650,000 tonnes remaining. Thorium is an important nuclear fuel and yields much more energy during the nuclear fission process than does uranium.

The second reason is, indirectly, the Indian education system, which encourages more science than technology amongst students. Consequently, the nation is a powerhouse for verifying, processing and interpreting second-hand information as can be obtained from CERN in Europe and Fermilab in the USA.

The ITER is scheduled to go online in 2012, and as we approach that date, its significance is gaining in the country because of the opposition the government has met with in setting up more fission reactors around the country. The arguments of the public are justified, but that doesn’t mean we are in a position to abandon the nuclear program.

Like all other sources of energy, there are problems, and the way to deal with these problems is not to brush them aside especially when the solutions can go a long way in resolving the energy crisis that threatens to cripple the nation. If we don’t switch to alternative sources of energy soon enough, fossil fuels will contribute as much as 60% to our energy source, and that is obviously unaffordable.

If the ITER becomes successful – and the chances are great that it will – then India’s full partnership with the program will translate into reduced costs when it comes to setting up nuclear fusion reactors. We need to give it some time, say, until 2016, for the technology to become fully deployable as a safe solution.

The ITER is not the only super-project that India is currently involved in. In Theni, about 500 km from here, a massive cavern is being excavated in the Bodi Hills to situate India’s first particle physics observatory. Called the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO), it will house the world’s largest neutrino detector that will study neutrinos coming from outer space as well as receive particles from the LHC at CERN for further study. The investment in the project is somewhere around Rs. 1,250 crore, and is expected to start functioning in 2012.

The national investment in R&D in India is currently 1.9% of the GDP. This translates to the faith the Indian government has begun to express in the scientific community. Right now, it does look like we are at a crossroads, where we must decide immediately to switch from nuclear fission reactors to solar power generators, but that’s not the end of the road.

Yes, renewable energy can be harnessed, but our research on that front is minimal, if not negligible. We can set up local grids that produce power and then feed it into the national grid at a feed-in tariff provided by the government, and that way, we can gradually reduce the load on the central grid.

At some point of time, we even might be able to define future growth rates based on just solar or wind power. However, nuclear fusion technology and the capabilities it purchases for growth and prosperity cannot be beat any time soon, and India’s emergence as a particle physics superpower is tied in to that goal.

Neutron economics I

We all have misconceptions about various things, but their potential for harm is not more pronounced than it is in the case of nuclear power generation. In fact, the momentum at which the subject is gaining relevance today practically mandates that ignorance, too, can cause just as much harm. Therefore, it is important to know what goes on inside a nuclear reactor due to which it produces power, what are the different kinds of fuel used in such power plants, what the scientific principles are that dictate the process flow, and so forth.

[caption id="attachment_20602" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Annual 2004 (May-July, 2006); EIA, System for the Analysis of Global markets (2007)."][/caption]

Nuclear power plants, or NPPs, are currently positioned within the proliferation stage: the threat of fossil fuel exhaustion is imminent and very real, and because of the lack of research invested in the development of plants that consume renewable energy, there approaches a developmental rupture in the future, a gap signifying the paucity of energy to sustain growth as well as the inability of forthcoming generations to comfortably define it. In light of such possibilities, nuclear power provides a suitable resource because of the following reasons.

1. Nuclear fuel could be considered to be yet under-exploited; even though reserves of usable uranium are running out, vast quantities of thorium and its isotopes await mining. However, it should be noted that only certain isotopes can be used for fuel, and in order to obtain a few grams of them, whole quintals will have to be mined and refined.


2. A few grams of the enriched isotope can deliver energy worth hundreds of tons of coal. At the same time, the undermining consequence is that the design of the power plant has to be such that it can withstand the generation of such amounts of energy in a matter of seconds.


3. A nuclear fusion reaction, which hasn't yet been deployed in the capacity of power generation, is more than one-million times stronger than a corresponding fission reaction, and produces no nuclear waste (theoretically). However, the engagement of such options has been delayed worldwide not by the costs involved but by the technology required to instigate and sustain such reactions.

 

[caption id="attachment_20595" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="The sun is essentially a nuclear fusion powerhouse."][/caption]

I am not writing to clarify which side of the debate (nuclear v. non-nuclear) I lie on but only to highlight the simple concepts and procedures that sustain any interest on the widespread use of NPPs. Let's begin with the fuel cycle.

 

Every atom (except hydrogen's) contains a nucleus that, in turn, contains protons and neutrons in some number. More often than not, the difference between the number of protons and the number of neutrons is 0 or 1. The protons have a positive charge, are each about 1,800 times times heavier than an electron, and are bound to the neutrons by the strongest natural force: the nuclear force. During a fission reaction, it is the sundering of this bond that yields the gargantuan amounts of energy. The electrons in the atom exist around the nucleus at multiple energy levels, which are called so because all electrons in the same level have the same amount of potential energy.

 

To set off a nuclear reaction, i.e., to break up the nucleus, the trick is to make it heavy and, thus, unstable, like a 10-kilogram dumbbell with a central bar made of straw. To make it heavier, a suitable particle has to be forced into the nucleus. Such force is necessary because of two reasons.

1. The protons and neutrons are both heavy particles. Forcing a much-lighter electron in would have no appreciable effect on the total mass of the nucleus.


2. The protons are positively-charged, which rules out the option of forcing extra protons into the nucleus because of the Coloumbic, or electric, repelling force.

The obvious conclusion is the use of a neutron. However, not all neutrons can be used because it is necessary that the nuclear trap the neutron, become heavier and start disintegrating instead of having the neutron zip past with no useful effect. Such slowed neutrons are called thermal neutrons, and when these thermal neutrons are captured by nuclei, the nuclei become what are called isotopes of their original form.

 

[caption id="attachment_20596" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="Uranium oxide"][/caption]

Now, in the event of a neutron capture, the chances of fission reactions occurring is not 100%: the nucleus may decide to whine away the excess mass through transmutation processes called alpha- and beta-decays. Having detailed as much, it becomes much easier to understand the working of a nuclear reactor.

1. A reactor core is readied where the nuclear reaction can take place in a controllable environment.


2. Enriched fuel is compacted in the shape of rods and inserted into the reactor core. The more the extent of insertion, the more nuclei are available for a fission reaction.


3. An adjacent chamber is flooded with heavy water and a source of neutrons is placed in it. (The molecular formula for water is H2O, which means each molecule contains two atoms of hydrogen. When these atoms are replaced by an isotope of hydrogen called deuterium, the resulting compound is called deuterium hydroxide or heavy water.)


4. At a suitable position within this arrangement, a provision for control rods is provided. Made of compounds of boron or cadmium, these rods, depending on the extent of their penetration into the chamber, are used to absorb excess neutrons in the event of their proliferation.


5. Voluminous ducts containing a coolant are coiled around the core to remove excess heat. In this case, let's assume the core is water-cooled.


6. When the reactor is ready, the control rods are fully retracted and the neutron source is allowed to generate fast neutrons.


7. These fast neutrons are slowed down upon collision with the surrounding heavy water molecules and become thermal neutrons.


8. The thermal neutrons are fed into the reactor core, where they are absorbed by the nuclei in the fuel rods.


9. A certain proportion of the nuclei begin the fissioning process, releasing massive quantities of kinetic energy, gamma radiation and more neutrons.


10. The kinetic energy manifests as an extremely high temperature within the reactor core.


11. The power plant's pumps are switched on and the water begins to flow in the coiled duct, across which heat is conducted and the water turns to steam. Consequently, the core cools down.


12. The steam is passed through a throttle that converts its pressure energy into kinetic energy, i.e., accelerates the steam into a jet that is guided onto the blades of a turbine that generates power.


13. Meanwhile, in the reactor core, even more neutrons are now available that at the start of the reaction because of the nuclear fission reactions that have already occurred.


14. To keep from all these neutrons causing nuclear havoc, the control rods are inserted enough to keep the rate of reactions tractable.


15. The available neutrons then continue to propagate the fission process with the remaining fuel.


16. The steam, after striking the blades of the turbine, slows down and is collected in a condenser. The vapor is then cooled, compressed and fed once more into the coiled ducts.

This is the nuclear fission process that occurs when a sufficiently enriched isotope is the fuel. Not all isotopes can be used in an NPP for power generation. They must meet certain requirements. For example, U-235 is used because its fission products can be handled to some extent, because the required technology to control its fission reaction exists, and because isotopic uranium is available in nature.

 

Once a neutron has been captured, the U-235 nucleus transmutes to a U-236 nucleus and becomes highly unstable. Because of the excess energy causing the instability, it begins to oscillate and eventually "comes apart", as a result of which the nuclear force breaks down and releases a massive amount of energy. If we assume that the U-235 nucleus was at zero-energy at the beginning and if the incoming thermal neutron had an energy of 1 electron-volt (eV), the resulting explosion releases somewhere around 215 mega-electron-volt (MeV): a jump of 215 million orders. Of this output, 168 MeV is in the form of kinetic energy, 17-26 MeV of gamma rays, 12 MeV of neutrons, 8 MeV of beta particles and the remaining of other fission products.

 

As stated earlier, the chances of a fission reaction occurring are not 100%, and when it doesn't happen, a process called beta decay takes its place. Note the emission of beta particles in a fission reaction: these particle-groups are of two kinds.

1. Negative beta decay: electron + electron anti-neutrino


2. Positive beta decay: positron + electron neutrino

(A positron is the anti-particle of the electron, i.e., it weighs the same as an electron and has all its properties, except for a +1 electrical charge instead of the electron's -1.)

When beta decay is said to occur, only positive or negative beta decay occurs; not both. Now, when a neutrino/anti-neutrino strikes a positively charged nucleus, the collision in question can occur only when a weak force comes into being between the neutrino and the nucleus. This weak force is mediated by a particle called the Z boson, which is an extremely heavy particle. To lose this temporarily gained excess mass/energy, the nucleus beta decays once more to become electrically neutral.

 

[caption id="attachment_20599" align="aligncenter" width="502" caption="Either Ce-173 or Sr-90 placed on a sheet of Alomogordo glass in the presence of a magnetic field emits beta particles, visible as feeble curves on the sheet."][/caption]

The beta decay process is important in reactors that use thorium-232 as nuclear fuel. When a Th-232 nucleus captures a thermal neutron, it undergoes fission, emits some gamma rays, and transmutes to Th-233. Next, Th-233 undergoes negative beta decay to become Pa-233 (protactinium), which beta decays once more to yield U-233. This isotope of uranium then captures a neutron, undergoes fission, releases two more neutrons, and becomes U-232. Now, U-232 is extremely radioactive (it is a strong emitter of gamma rays) and its formation is the principle disadvantage of employing a Th-232 nuclear fission cycle.

 

Therewith concludes the discussion on the principles of a nuclear fission reaction.

Neutron economics I

We all have misconceptions about various things, but their potential for harm is not more pronounced than it is in the case of nuclear power generation. In fact, the momentum at which the subject is gaining relevance today practically mandates that ignorance, too, can cause just as much harm. Therefore, it is important to know what goes on inside a nuclear reactor due to which it produces power, what are the different kinds of fuel used in such power plants, what the scientific principles are that dictate the process flow, and so forth.

[caption id="attachment_20602" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="Sources: Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Annual 2004 (May-July, 2006); EIA, System for the Analysis of Global markets (2007)."][/caption]

Nuclear power plants, or NPPs, are currently positioned within the proliferation stage: the threat of fossil fuel exhaustion is imminent and very real, and because of the lack of research invested in the development of plants that consume renewable energy, there approaches a developmental rupture in the future, a gap signifying the paucity of energy to sustain growth as well as the inability of forthcoming generations to comfortably define it. In light of such possibilities, nuclear power provides a suitable resource because of the following reasons.

1. Nuclear fuel could be considered to be yet under-exploited; even though reserves of usable uranium are running out, vast quantities of thorium and its isotopes await mining. However, it should be noted that only certain isotopes can be used for fuel, and in order to obtain a few grams of them, whole quintals will have to be mined and refined.


2. A few grams of the enriched isotope can deliver energy worth hundreds of tons of coal. At the same time, the undermining consequence is that the design of the power plant has to be such that it can withstand the generation of such amounts of energy in a matter of seconds.


3. A nuclear fusion reaction, which hasn't yet been deployed in the capacity of power generation, is more than one-million times stronger than a corresponding fission reaction, and produces no nuclear waste (theoretically). However, the engagement of such options has been delayed worldwide not by the costs involved but by the technology required to instigate and sustain such reactions.

 

[caption id="attachment_20595" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="The sun is essentially a nuclear fusion powerhouse."][/caption]

I am not writing to clarify which side of the debate (nuclear v. non-nuclear) I lie on but only to highlight the simple concepts and procedures that sustain any interest on the widespread use of NPPs. Let's begin with the fuel cycle.

 

Every atom (except hydrogen's) contains a nucleus that, in turn, contains protons and neutrons in some number. More often than not, the difference between the number of protons and the number of neutrons is 0 or 1. The protons have a positive charge, are each about 1,800 times times heavier than an electron, and are bound to the neutrons by the strongest natural force: the nuclear force. During a fission reaction, it is the sundering of this bond that yields the gargantuan amounts of energy. The electrons in the atom exist around the nucleus at multiple energy levels, which are called so because all electrons in the same level have the same amount of potential energy.

 

To set off a nuclear reaction, i.e., to break up the nucleus, the trick is to make it heavy and, thus, unstable, like a 10-kilogram dumbbell with a central bar made of straw. To make it heavier, a suitable particle has to be forced into the nucleus. Such force is necessary because of two reasons.

1. The protons and neutrons are both heavy particles. Forcing a much-lighter electron in would have no appreciable effect on the total mass of the nucleus.


2. The protons are positively-charged, which rules out the option of forcing extra protons into the nucleus because of the Coloumbic, or electric, repelling force.

The obvious conclusion is the use of a neutron. However, not all neutrons can be used because it is necessary that the nuclear trap the neutron, become heavier and start disintegrating instead of having the neutron zip past with no useful effect. Such slowed neutrons are called thermal neutrons, and when these thermal neutrons are captured by nuclei, the nuclei become what are called isotopes of their original form.

 

[caption id="attachment_20596" align="aligncenter" width="600" caption="Uranium oxide"][/caption]

Now, in the event of a neutron capture, the chances of fission reactions occurring is not 100%: the nucleus may decide to whine away the excess mass through transmutation processes called alpha- and beta-decays. Having detailed as much, it becomes much easier to understand the working of a nuclear reactor.

1. A reactor core is readied where the nuclear reaction can take place in a controllable environment.


2. Enriched fuel is compacted in the shape of rods and inserted into the reactor core. The more the extent of insertion, the more nuclei are available for a fission reaction.


3. An adjacent chamber is flooded with heavy water and a source of neutrons is placed in it. (The molecular formula for water is H2O, which means each molecule contains two atoms of hydrogen. When these atoms are replaced by an isotope of hydrogen called deuterium, the resulting compound is called deuterium hydroxide or heavy water.)


4. At a suitable position within this arrangement, a provision for control rods is provided. Made of compounds of boron or cadmium, these rods, depending on the extent of their penetration into the chamber, are used to absorb excess neutrons in the event of their proliferation.


5. Voluminous ducts containing a coolant are coiled around the core to remove excess heat. In this case, let's assume the core is water-cooled.


6. When the reactor is ready, the control rods are fully retracted and the neutron source is allowed to generate fast neutrons.


7. These fast neutrons are slowed down upon collision with the surrounding heavy water molecules and become thermal neutrons.


8. The thermal neutrons are fed into the reactor core, where they are absorbed by the nuclei in the fuel rods.


9. A certain proportion of the nuclei begin the fissioning process, releasing massive quantities of kinetic energy, gamma radiation and more neutrons.


10. The kinetic energy manifests as an extremely high temperature within the reactor core.


11. The power plant's pumps are switched on and the water begins to flow in the coiled duct, across which heat is conducted and the water turns to steam. Consequently, the core cools down.


12. The steam is passed through a throttle that converts its pressure energy into kinetic energy, i.e., accelerates the steam into a jet that is guided onto the blades of a turbine that generates power.


13. Meanwhile, in the reactor core, even more neutrons are now available that at the start of the reaction because of the nuclear fission reactions that have already occurred.


14. To keep from all these neutrons causing nuclear havoc, the control rods are inserted enough to keep the rate of reactions tractable.


15. The available neutrons then continue to propagate the fission process with the remaining fuel.


16. The steam, after striking the blades of the turbine, slows down and is collected in a condenser. The vapor is then cooled, compressed and fed once more into the coiled ducts.

This is the nuclear fission process that occurs when a sufficiently enriched isotope is the fuel. Not all isotopes can be used in an NPP for power generation. They must meet certain requirements. For example, U-235 is used because its fission products can be handled to some extent, because the required technology to control its fission reaction exists, and because isotopic uranium is available in nature.

 

Once a neutron has been captured, the U-235 nucleus transmutes to a U-236 nucleus and becomes highly unstable. Because of the excess energy causing the instability, it begins to oscillate and eventually "comes apart", as a result of which the nuclear force breaks down and releases a massive amount of energy. If we assume that the U-235 nucleus was at zero-energy at the beginning and if the incoming thermal neutron had an energy of 1 electron-volt (eV), the resulting explosion releases somewhere around 215 mega-electron-volt (MeV): a jump of 215 million orders. Of this output, 168 MeV is in the form of kinetic energy, 17-26 MeV of gamma rays, 12 MeV of neutrons, 8 MeV of beta particles and the remaining of other fission products.

 

As stated earlier, the chances of a fission reaction occurring are not 100%, and when it doesn't happen, a process called beta decay takes its place. Note the emission of beta particles in a fission reaction: these particle-groups are of two kinds.

1. Negative beta decay: electron + electron anti-neutrino


2. Positive beta decay: positron + electron neutrino

(A positron is the anti-particle of the electron, i.e., it weighs the same as an electron and has all its properties, except for a +1 electrical charge instead of the electron's -1.)

When beta decay is said to occur, only positive or negative beta decay occurs; not both. Now, when a neutrino/anti-neutrino strikes a positively charged nucleus, the collision in question can occur only when a weak force comes into being between the neutrino and the nucleus. This weak force is mediated by a particle called the Z boson, which is an extremely heavy particle. To lose this temporarily gained excess mass/energy, the nucleus beta decays once more to become electrically neutral.

 

[caption id="attachment_20599" align="aligncenter" width="502" caption="Either Ce-173 or Sr-90 placed on a sheet of Alomogordo glass in the presence of a magnetic field emits beta particles, visible as feeble curves on the sheet."][/caption]

The beta decay process is important in reactors that use thorium-232 as nuclear fuel. When a Th-232 nucleus captures a thermal neutron, it undergoes fission, emits some gamma rays, and transmutes to Th-233. Next, Th-233 undergoes negative beta decay to become Pa-233 (protactinium), which beta decays once more to yield U-233. This isotope of uranium then captures a neutron, undergoes fission, releases two more neutrons, and becomes U-232. Now, U-232 is extremely radioactive (it is a strong emitter of gamma rays) and its formation is the principle disadvantage of employing a Th-232 nuclear fission cycle.

 

Therewith concludes the discussion on the principles of a nuclear fission reaction.